Is My Coffee Getting Weaker?
The first sip of my usual latte didn’t hit the same today… and it wasn’t just my imagination. Right?
The Latte Dilemma
You go to Java Junction every morning and order the same drink: a double-shot vanilla oat milk latte. Over the past week, something feels… off.
You suspect they’ve secretly reduced the caffeine content — maybe to cut costs?
Now you’re faced with the big question:
“Is my coffee actually weaker, or am I just overthinking it?”
Let’s use hypothesis testing to find out.
What Is Hypothesis Testing?
Hypothesis testing helps us use data to answer yes/no questions like:
- “Is this new medication effective?”
- “Has customer behavior changed?”
- “Is my latte less caffeinated?”
It’s like a courtroom trial:
You assume the shop is innocent (i.e., nothing changed) unless the evidence says otherwise.
Setting Up the Hypotheses
Here’s what we test:
Term | Meaning |
---|---|
Null Hypothesis (H₀) | The latte still has the usual caffeine (say, 150mg). |
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁) | The caffeine content is less than 150mg. |
This is a one-tailed test — we’re only worried if it’s weaker.
The Evidence: You Collect Data
You bring a home caffeine tester (yes, they exist) and measure your latte for 7 days:
[142mg, 144mg, 143mg, 141mg, 140mg, 143mg, 142mg]
- Sample mean = 142.1mg
- Assumed population mean = 150mg
- Sample size = 7
- Estimated standard deviation ≈ 1.3mg
Running the Test
You decide on a significance level α = 0.05 (5% chance you’re wrong if you reject H₀).
Using a t-test (small sample, unknown population std), you compute:
- t-statistic = (142.1 - 150) / (1.3 / sqrt(7)) ≈ -14.8
- p-value ≈ 0.00001 (very small!)
What Is a p-value, Really?
The p-value tells you how likely you are to see a sample like yours (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis were true.
In our case:
If your lattes really still had 150mg of caffeine, how likely is it to measure an average of 142.1mg or less, just due to random variation?
A small p-value means:
“Whoa, this result is too unlikely under the null — maybe the null isn’t true.”
In plain English:
If the coffee were still 150mg, the odds of randomly getting your weak-tasting results are extremely low. So it’s reasonable to believe something has changed.
Decision Time
Since p < 0.05, you reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: Your coffee is weaker — statistically speaking.
Why This Matters
This may seem like a coffee problem, but the concept powers much of modern science and business:
- A/B testing websites
- Drug trial approvals
- Quality control in manufacturing
- Marketing campaign evaluations
And yes… catching shady latte dilution schemes.
Summary: How Hypothesis Testing Works
Step | Example |
---|---|
State H₀ and H₁ | H₀: Caffeine is 150mg; H₁: It’s less |
Collect data | 7 caffeine samples |
Choose significance level | α = 0.05 |
Compute test statistic | Use t-test |
Compare p-value to α | If p < α, reject H₀ |
Conclusion
Whether it’s coffee, company profits, or climate change — hypothesis testing gives us a way to use evidence instead of just gut feelings.
But yes — sometimes your gut was right all along. Especially about lattes.
Stay skeptical. Stay caffeinated.